The argument for or against prison privatization surrounds the issue of money. In a response to a hardened economy and rising incarceration rates, there has been a great deal of growth in the privatization of prisons. Privatization is changing something from state to private ownership or control. Meaning they are not funded by the government. The prison is going to be run like a business.
Pros of privatization of prisons: the government is in millions of dollars in debt and they will gave money if they are not funding them. The government spends on average 20 million dollars by funding the prison system.If a state can transfer inmates to a private prison, there will be room within the state prisons for more inmates or the proper amount of space for the inmates that are already there.
Cons of privatization of prisons: no requirement in the jail system. There won't be any set rules for the inmates, guards, etc. to follow, which will ultimately cause disagreement throughout the prison. When not run by government, the jail system heads can possibly underpay the officers. Because they are being paid poorly, the officers might not be doing a good job.
I support the privatization of prisons because private prisons could create more jobs within local communities, strengthening the local economy. Also, I think it will greatly benefit the government of the US. America's financial state is very bad because of the millions or dollars we are in debt. Giving the job of funding the prisons to someone else would help the economy. The concept of privatization is indeed a very bright idea that has so many advantages though the issue needs to be put under more scrutiny.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Friday, March 29, 2013
Blog #5
In studying
socialization we have discussed the importance of acquiring culture, language
and thought. There are a variety of factors that influence our own
behavior as well as a number that demonstrate how we impact others. While
watching "Radio" we see a number of relationships and social
interactions that occur as a result of our influences from agents of
socialization such as family, peer group and school.
In the
beginning of this movie, the main character's, Radio, life is affected by
lack of socialization. At first, Radio would just walk around all day and not
interact with people besides his family. When Coach Jones and other people
started talking to him he did not know how to respond, did not how to make eye
contact when speaking to a person. Radio's life was greatly affected by the
lack of socialization also because the boys on the football team continuously
picked on him. For example, when the boys tied him in the shed after practice
one night.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Blog #4 Socialization of Gender
Men and women socialize very differently. Men are usually more introverted and quiet, while girls are more energetic, loud, and talkative. Every single human interaction is influenced in some way by gender. The differences between the genders is narrower than in times past, but there will always be a difference. Men and women subtly, and not so subtly sometimes, experience the world differently. Our senses are different, our emotions are different and our life experiences (paths of womanhood and manhood) are different. And finally the societal expectations for each is different. Since it is impossible to sum it all up one can simply state that "men and women are equal, but different".
5 examples of how men and women socialize differently:
1) Field Observation: I observed the way students talked and socialized in the cafeteria during lunch. Boys talked in a rude manner and were more open about taking risks. For example, throwing something into the trash can from their seat as apposed to girls who walk towards the can to throw something out. The girls talked much more often than the boys. When the boys stopped talking for a moment it was not awkward, but when the girls stopped talking the situation became awkward for them.
2) Through my observations, I saw that boys are much more open to speaking to other people who are not in their immediate group of friends. The girls during lunch time for example only talked to their immediate friends who were sitting with them at a table and not to anyone outside of their 'group'. The boys talked to everyone. Through this, I saw that boys are much more open to building new bonds and are better are communicating with others.
3) Males are much better at thinking about one thing at a time rather than many. This is not to say that females are any less adept at problem solving, but rather that the male mind is more suited to single-pointed thinking, while the female mind is associated with multi-tasking and with making connections between different fields. In many situations, a particular problem between two people will most likely be resolved by a male, while a more general situation within a community will be addressed by a girl.
4) By observing the way males and females interact with each other in the hallways; I saw that the girls were much more affectionate to each other. When a girl seemed sad, their female friend would walk up to them to comfort her, while a boy would just leave their friend alone; thinking that is the best way to approach the situation.
5) Also by observing students during lunch, I saw that girls used/checked their phones more often than the boys did. Every couple of minutes a female would check her phone and send a text, whereas the males checked their phone once or twice during the 48 minute time period. I feel like girls are more dependent on cell phones and texting to get their message across or too shy to say it in person.
5 examples of how men and women socialize differently:
1) Field Observation: I observed the way students talked and socialized in the cafeteria during lunch. Boys talked in a rude manner and were more open about taking risks. For example, throwing something into the trash can from their seat as apposed to girls who walk towards the can to throw something out. The girls talked much more often than the boys. When the boys stopped talking for a moment it was not awkward, but when the girls stopped talking the situation became awkward for them.
2) Through my observations, I saw that boys are much more open to speaking to other people who are not in their immediate group of friends. The girls during lunch time for example only talked to their immediate friends who were sitting with them at a table and not to anyone outside of their 'group'. The boys talked to everyone. Through this, I saw that boys are much more open to building new bonds and are better are communicating with others.
3) Males are much better at thinking about one thing at a time rather than many. This is not to say that females are any less adept at problem solving, but rather that the male mind is more suited to single-pointed thinking, while the female mind is associated with multi-tasking and with making connections between different fields. In many situations, a particular problem between two people will most likely be resolved by a male, while a more general situation within a community will be addressed by a girl.
4) By observing the way males and females interact with each other in the hallways; I saw that the girls were much more affectionate to each other. When a girl seemed sad, their female friend would walk up to them to comfort her, while a boy would just leave their friend alone; thinking that is the best way to approach the situation.
5) Also by observing students during lunch, I saw that girls used/checked their phones more often than the boys did. Every couple of minutes a female would check her phone and send a text, whereas the males checked their phone once or twice during the 48 minute time period. I feel like girls are more dependent on cell phones and texting to get their message across or too shy to say it in person.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Blog #3- Sociological Research and You!
1) After listening to each
group's presentation of their sociological research, I think Jennifer’s, Michelle’s
and Anthony’s research is the most interesting, effective, measureable, and
significant. I think this because their topic is can be debatable. Many people
have different opinions about when to tell someone that they are adopted, when
Santa/Tooth Fairy is fake. I thought that the way their measured their
information was correct also because of the way they had an open ended survey.
That way they can get better more varied and detailed answers. I think the most
difficult one to measure or understand was Marcia and Karina’s. I though the
idea was very interesting and clever however I think it is very hard to find
out the truth behind the concept of fear from just answering a few questions on
a survey.
2) I am a very outgoing
person; however many people think I am shy. I do not like to say much upon
meeting someone for the first time but then when I get to know them I begin to
open up more. I am also a very happy and positive person who looks on the
bright side of things for 99.9% of the time. My personality defines or affects
me because I am friends with people who are like me and have a similar
personality. One of my weakness and strengths at the same time is that I do not
quit until I get a job done. I am a perfectionist and sometimes I will be up
till 2 doing everything to make it the best. My weakness is that I am
very impatient. Another strength is that I am very motivated and determined. I consider
myself a very impatient, quiet and shy depending on the situation, talkative,
calm, introverted person. My family and friends greatly influence my
personality.
3) "With the new day
comes new strength and new thoughts." Eleanor Roosevelt.
This quote influences and motivates me because
if I had a bad day then the next day (the new day) I will give myself a chance
to do be strong again and think about motivational and influential things.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Blog #3
1) In my opinion I
think that the theory of Functionalist best applies to my way of thinking about
human behavior and our society. This teaches us a lesson, maintain order, and
jobs; all these are prevalent in today’s society. Symbolic interactionst:
labeling theory (prototypical criminal), people from certain places more likely
to commit crime. I think this is true because of the blue, pink, yellow example.
When someone has a blue room people assume they are a boy, if they have a pink
room then girl, however yellow is for both. In the hallway at school the other
day I heard a few boys talking about a crime that occurred. I also heard them
talk about how they think people from certain places or ethnicities are more
likely to commit crime.
2) I feel that people will obey authority under any circumstances if
it is indeed legal authority rather than people's consciences override their
ability to follows authoritative demands. I think so because the physical
presence of an authority figure increases compliance. We can see this in
school; in most cases, when the vice principal or principal tell a student to
do something (like go to detention) they do it without question.
3) After
watching Jane Elliott's "Eye of the Storm" I do not think an
experiment like that would not be successful today. In todays society people
would not take this kind of experiment seriously, which will not give correct
results. A type of experiment we might be able to conduct in order to
teach and or raise awareness about prejudice and bias, bullying and
intimidation is to education students of all ages in school with a program.
Also you can connect wireless
microphones and videotaped the students as they played in the schoolyard, and
then they can watch and learn from their mistakes.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
Blog #1 - The Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature vs. Nurture
-Eye color: Nature.
A persons eye color is determined by their genes. 2 cells join to make a
gamete. These cells determine what you will look like.
-Height: Nature.
Genetics determine a persons height. For example, if both the parents of a
person are tall, than the offspring will also be tall.
-Intelligence: Both
nature and nurture. If a student wants to receive a high grade on a test, he or
she will study very hard until they grasp all the information to answer all the
questions on the test. Therefore it is nurture because the student is studying
hard and their environment is allowing them to do so. However it is also nature
because again of genetics. If a persons parents are really bright and smart,
then there is a high chance that their children will also be intelligent.
-Weight: Both nature
and nurture. Obesity and being overweight can be passed down from parent
to offspring. If a child's mom is obese than there is a
high chance that when that child grows, he or she will also be obese. It is
nurture also because if a person goes out to eat at fast food chains every
night and is not physically active then their weight will be
affected.
-Risk taking: Both
nature and nurture. Example: Bob loves excitement and is a risk taker. His
father and grandfather are also risk taker. Nurture: external influences
such as friends who "make" a person take risks.
-Profession:
Nurture. Chossing a profession is 95% of the time what that person is
interested in and wants to do for the rest of their life. But 5% of the time,
nurture pressures them into picking a certain profession. For example becoming
a doctor.
-Athletic Ability:
Both nature and nurture. If a persons parents are Olympic champions
then they will also have the good sports trait in their genes. However, it is
also nurture because if the child is surrounded by sports and
practices all the time, he or she will start to be athletic.
-Smoking: Both
nature and nurture. If someones parents smoke, the person can say that it is
okay to smoke because their parents do it and start to smoke. Nurture: The
people you hang out with. If a person hangs out with people who smoke, then
they are likely to begin smoking as well.
-Music Ability: Both
nature and nurture. If someones parents are musicians or composers then there
is a high chance that they will too be musically talented. Also, nurture
because if a person is surrounded by music, then he or she will begin to be musically
good too.
-Violent Behavior:
Both nature and nurture. Hanging out with friends that are violent leads to a
person acting violently as well. At home, if a person is surrounded by violent
behavior; after a while, they will be acting violently.
-Heart Disease: Both
nature and nurture. Heart disease is hereditary, which means that if your
family has it then there is a chance you too might get it. Nurture because by
eating unhealthy foods, not exercising and leading an unhealthy life can cause
heart disease and other illnesses.
-Mental Illness:
Nature because mental illness has some of the highest genetic loading of any
common illness.
-Humor:Nurture.
Humor all depends on how an individual grows up and what he or she thinks is
funny.
-Interest in Math
& Science OR Arts & Humanities: Nurture. I tutor 2 girls everyday after
school. Their parents are both surgeons. Medical field is all science and math.
Both the girls hate math and science. Therefore, interest in a certain subject
is not nature but is nurture.
-Skilled
ability to perform in Math/Science OR Art/Humanities: Nurture. Nurture: My
above example about the girls I tutor. Their parents are really smart and
intelligent. Being surgeons, they are espeically smart in math and science.
Their children on the other hand struggle with those subjects.
1) Discuss whether
you think nature or nurture is a bigger factor in influencing one's personality
and behavior and why?
I think
nurture influences one's personality and behavior because nurture affects our
brains and smarts. For example, children who eat foods that contain lead
or any other harmful substances develop irreversible damage to their brains,
and this affects their intelligence over time. Also, during the day people
are usually surrounded more by society than anything else; school, sports,
extracurricular activites.
2) What factors
weigh so heavily on this debate and how do you think we could possibly learn
more from it?
A
factor might be where someone is living (location). Nurture factors that
trigger an individual to commit crime are influences by social and environment
factors. Nature factors that trigger an individual to commit crime are
influences by biological and family facotrs. We can learn more about modern day
society this way, and see how society has changed over time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)